- Безусловная гарантия возврата денег в любое время
- Бесплатная миграция под управлением экспертов, бесплатные SSL-сертификаты
- Поддержка доступна 24/7/365 по телефону, электронной почте, чату и в базе знаний
- 30-дневная гарантия возврата денег
- Оптимизация производительности на основе ИИ и Turbo-хостинг, обеспечивающий скорость до 20 раз выше
- Внутренняя поддержка доступна 24/7/365 по телефону, в онлайн-чате и через тикетную систему
ScalaHosting vs Hosting.com: Quick Summary
After trying both platforms myself, ScalaHosting took the lead for me.
Hosting.com had some nice perks like affordable pricing and fast live chat, but ScalaHosting won me over with its stronger features, better security, faster speeds, and a much smoother experience for WordPress and VPS users.
Also, their tools and support seem built for growth and more tech-savvy users, so it’s the smarter choice if you’re planning for the long haul.
1. Prices and Plans Comparison
Hosting.com’s Cheap Plans Are Tough for ScalaHosting to Beat.
When it comes to pricing, Hosting.com is clearly more aggressive, especially for shared hosting. I tested plans from both providers, and Hosting.com’s introductory prices were way cheaper across nearly every category.
From shared hosting at $1.99/month to WordPress and cPanel hosting, Hosting.com constantly came out with lower upfront costs. ScalaHosting, on the other hand, offers better value on higher-tier cloud VPS and managed services, but its entry-level plans are significantly more expensive.
Unless you’re targeting advanced cloud setups, Hosting.com simply gives you more for less when you’re just starting out or running small projects.
2. Customer Support Comparison: Who’s Got Your Back?
Hosting.com Offers Fast and Helpful Live Chat for Quick Assistance.
ScalaHosting Customer Support
I wanted to see if ScalaHosting’s reputation for excellent support actually holds up, so I tested both their ticket and live chat systems.
Ticket Support
From the ScalaHosting dashboard, I navigated to Support > Open New Ticket.
The form was clear: I chose the department, set the priority to “Normal,” and submitted a question about my missing SPanel admin login credentials.
I was honestly impressed—within 5 minutes, I received a reply from Jordan, a Level 2 Tech Support agent. He didn’t just give me a copy-paste answer. Instead, he explained that my product welcome email should have included the SPanel setup link, and if I couldn’t find it, he’d set it up manually for me.
I replied asking him to go ahead and create it, and sure enough, just a few minutes later, I received my admin credentials.
I appreciated how efficient and respectful the experience was. No waiting around for hours. They were quick, clear, and helpful.
Live Chat Support
Next, I wanted to check out ScalaHosting’s live chat. I clicked the chat icon at the bottom right corner of the page and filled out my name, email, and department. I then asked about enabling SSH access for running performance tests on my VPS.
Within less than a minute, an agent named Todor joined the chat. He confirmed that SPanel lets me enable SSH access for each account and explained that for root-level access, I’d need to open a support ticket, which they could do on my behalf.
Todor guided me through how to find and share my support PIN for verification. Once I provided it, he opened the ticket for me and sent me a link to Scala’s SSH guide.
The chat was smooth, detailed, and helpful—even though the issue required escalation, I was never left hanging or confused.
Hosting.com Customer Support
To give Hosting.com a fair review, I tested both their ticket system and live chat to see how quickly and clearly they respond.
Support Ticket
I accessed the ticket system by clicking Help > Open Support Ticket.
I submitted a technical question around firewall setup on an unmanaged VPS, asking how to allow just ports 22, 80, and 443.
The form was straightforward and included file uploads, which I liked.
However, the response didn’t arrive until 26 hours later. That was disappointing, especially from a provider that claims 24/7 support.
When I finally got the reply, it was polite, but the agent basically said they couldn’t provide detailed help since it was an unmanaged VPS. They offered to review steps I take on my own but didn’t provide a walkthrough or proactive help.
So, while the tone was professional, the delay and limited assistance felt lacking, especially if you’re not very technical.
Live Chat
The live chat was a much better experience. From the dashboard, I clicked the chat icon and submitted my name, email, and question.
A bot appeared first, then within about 2 minutes, an agent named Daniel joined the conversation.
I asked about how VPS resource allocation works and what changes if I upgrade to a managed VPS. Daniel explained things clearly—that I’d get full access to the server resources (e.g., all 16GB of RAM could go to one site unless I limited it), and that managed plans would include software support and performance optimization.
What stood out was that he didn’t just drop a link or give a copy-paste reply. He also asked follow-up questions, like how many sites I planned to run. It felt like a real conversation.
3. Hosting Features Comparison
ScalaHosting Offers More Robust and Developer-Friendly Hosting Features.
ScalaHosting Features
During my testing, ScalaHosting stood out for how much value it packs into even its entry-level plans. You get automated daily backups by default, which is a big plus for peace of mind—no extra setup required.
The unlimited email accounts are also a significant advantage, especially for businesses managing multiple departments or clients.
What makes ScalaHosting truly unique is its SPanel control panel, which is a lightweight and efficient alternative to cPanel.
It includes:
- A built-in WordPress Manager with staging, cloning, and plugin/theme management
- SShield, an AI-driven security system that blocks over 99% of attacks
- Real-time usage statistics
- Full SSH and WP-CLI access for developers
On top of that, you get OpenLiteSpeed web server support, Object Cache, and CDN integration, which make the platform fast and highly optimized for WordPress performance.
The ability to host unlimited websites (on all but the Mini plan) and the flexible scalability into cloud VPS hosting makes ScalaHosting ideal for growing projects.
Hosting.com Features
Hosting.com does a great job catering to beginners and small businesses looking for a plug-and-play experience. I was impressed by how quickly I could launch a WordPress site using the Extendify AI builder, which walked me through the setup and even suggested content and images.
Each plan includes a custom TurboHub control panel designed for non-technical users, with optional cPanel for those who prefer more granular control.
The plans come with pre-installed plugins like:
- LiteSpeed Cache
- MonsterInsights
- All-in-One SEO
- WP Forms
You also get access to staging environments, domain aliases, and free SSL certificates. However, some limitations became clear.
You can only host one website per plan, and backups must be configured manually, which can be a concern for users who forget or don’t know how to schedule them. While the platform is fast and polished, it’s more restrictive than ScalaHosting for advanced users.
4. Website Performance Comparison
ScalaHosting Loads Faster and Handles Resources More Efficiently.
To get a real sense of how both platforms perform under typical conditions, I ran GTmetrix tests on live websites hosted with Hosting.com and ScalaHosting.
ScalaHosting GTmetrix Results
I tested a WordPress site hosted on ScalaHosting, and the results were impressive.
|
|
The site was hosted in San Antonio, TX, and even though the TTFB was slightly higher than Hosting.com’s, everything else—from page rendering to interactivity—was consistently faster.
The LCP being just 1.2s is a clear sign that the first meaningful visual content loads quickly, and a Total Blocking Time of 0ms shows there were no JavaScript delays holding things up.
Overall, ScalaHosting delivered a clean, lightweight, and efficient page load with minimal layout shifts or delays. The frontend experience was seamless from the moment the page started loading to full interactivity.
Hosting.com GTmetrix Results
Next, I tested a site hosted on Hosting.com. Here’s how it performed:
|
|
The test was run from London, UK, and Hosting.com did well in most areas. The LCP of 1.4s is still within Google’s recommended range, and the structure score was solid.
However, there was a slight delay in fully loading the site—2.1s total load time compared to Scala’s 1.4s. That’s a 50% increase, which might not seem huge on paper, but on a user’s phone or low-bandwidth connection, that extra second could matter.
Also, the 26ms of Total Blocking Time isn’t bad, but it shows that Hosting.com had a bit more JavaScript blocking or resource delay compared to ScalaHosting’s smooth run.
That said, I want to highlight that Hosting.com had a faster backend response (TTFB) than ScalaHosting, which could be a result of optimized caching on their server. It’s just that the overall frontend load took slightly longer.
5. Ease of Use Comparison: Which Platform Is Easier to Use?
ScalaHosting Wins With a More Streamlined and User-Friendly Experience.
Registration and Creating a New Account
I began with ScalaHosting. From the homepage, I clicked the “Hosting” tab and chose Managed Cloud VPS to test their flagship service.
On the pricing page, I selected the Build #1 plan and hit “Get started.”
What I liked immediately? Everything—account creation, service configuration, and payment—was contained on one page. I didn’t have to keep clicking “Next.”
I entered my email, name, and phone number, then selected a payment method (they support credit card, PayPal, or bank transfer).
I also got to customize the VPS—choosing my OS, control panel (SPanel or cPanel), and data center location—right there on the checkout screen. No guesswork.
After confirming everything and agreeing to the terms, I placed the order. ScalaHosting redirected me to the client dashboard, and I also got a confirmation email with my login info. Honestly, the signup flow was seamless—it felt like they designed it with clarity in mind.
Next, I tried Hosting.com. I followed a similar path: from the homepage, I hovered over “Hosting” and selected VPS Hosting under the “Servers” tab.
I reviewed the options and picked the VPS M plan, clicking “Buy Now.”
Here’s where Hosting.com impressed me: the product configuration page was powerful yet simple. I chose my billing term, operating system (I went with AlmaLinux), added optional features like cPanel, and picked my server location (I chose Dallas).
On the right side of the screen, a real-time summary updated as I made changes—super helpful.
After clicking “Confirm and Proceed,” I was taken to account creation and billing. I entered my name, email, and password, selected PayPal as my payment method, and placed the order.
Hosting.com also emailed me login details, and I was inside my dashboard in no time.
Both providers made the signup process simple. But Hosting.com gave me a bit more flexibility and transparency in customizing my server setup.
User Interface – Client Area & Dashboard
Right after signing up, I wanted to see how intuitive the dashboards were, especially for users who want quick access to hosting services.
At ScalaHosting, logging into the dashboard felt clean and familiar. The layout has two main panels: the left sidebar for navigation and the main panel on the right.
From here, I could view my services, manage domains, access support, or update billing—all within two clicks.
I clicked “My Services” and then the specific VPS I ordered. Everything I needed was right there. Live chat support? Always at the bottom right. The interface felt organized and beginner-friendly, and I never felt lost or overwhelmed.
Next, I tried Hosting.com’s dashboard. As soon as I logged in, it greeted me with “Welcome, [My Name],” which was a nice touch.
The layout used a smart split-pane structure: the left menu lets you switch between products, billing, domains, and support, while the right panel updated without reloading the page.
Under “Hosting”, I found all my active services. It showed the domain, plan name, renewal date, and status. For users managing multiple products, this overview is very helpful. What I liked most was that clicking anything didn’t reload the page—it just updated the right-side panel instantly. It made everything feel snappy.
Overall, Hosting.com felt just a little faster and more fluid, but ScalaHosting was equally well-organized and extremely user-friendly. Both score high marks here.
Hosting Setup – Creating a New WordPress Website
After signing up for ScalaHosting, I wanted to see how simple it would be to get a WordPress website up and running. ScalaHosting gives you two main ways to install WordPress: you can either do it during account creation or after setup using the WordPress Manager inside SPanel.
Right after logging into the SPanel Admin Interface, the first thing I had to do was create a new SPanel user account. This is the foundation for hosting your new website.
From the Admin homepage, I clicked the “Create a New Account” button.
At the top of the setup page, I saw three options:
- Include WordPress installation
- WordPress + Spectra Website Builder
- Create an Empty Account
I chose the “Include WordPress installation” option first to test a clean setup. After filling in my domain name and user credentials, I hit the button to proceed.
SPanel then automatically installed WordPress as part of the new account setup. Once the process completed, it showed me a summary with all the important details:
- IP address
- Nameservers
- SPanel login credentials
- WordPress login credentials
- And direct links to access both the SPanel UI and WP admin area
If you want to install WordPress in a subfolder instead of the main domain, there’s also the option to create an empty account and set everything up manually afterward.
Next, I tested the “WordPress + Spectra Website Builder” option. Spectra is a visual block-based builder that works within WordPress to give you drag-and-drop layouts and design flexibility.
When I selected this, SPanel asked what kind of site I wanted to build—like a blog, a business site, or an online store—and then pre-installed Spectra with ready-made layouts tailored to that use case.
Again, once the account was created, everything was displayed in a detailed summary page. This made it incredibly easy to jump into the WP dashboard and start customizing my site.
If you’re someone who wants a complete WordPress setup without manually installing anything, this method is as beginner-friendly as it gets.
Now let’s talk Hosting.com. After clicking Manage next to my VPS, I saw a big Login to Control Panel button.
One click, and I was inside cPanel—no need to re-enter my credentials. Super smooth.
In cPanel, I opened Softaculous App Installer, clicked “Install WordPress,” selected my domain, filled in my admin details, and hit Install.
The process was fast, intuitive, and beginner-friendly. No settings were hidden, and the form guided me through each field clearly.
Both hosts made WordPress installation easy, but I found ScalaHosting slightly more flexible. The option to install WP during setup, plus the plugin selections inside SPanel, made it feel like a tailored experience for WordPress users.
Server Management
This is especially important if you’re on a VPS and want root access or need tools for hands-on management.
On ScalaHosting, I clicked My Services, selected my server, and then opened SPanel.
This opened a new tab and prompted me to log in. Once inside, the layout is split into three main categories:
- Accounts Management: Create new user accounts, assign access levels, and manage packages.
- Server Management: Control backups, API tokens, and monitor resource usage.
- Software Tools: Access the Web Server Manager, Database Manager, and Softaculous for one-click app installs.
I liked that SPanel grouped everything logically and provided advanced tools without overwhelming me. I could reboot the server, change PHP versions, configure domains, or manage SSL—all from one place. It’s friendly for beginners but also powerful enough for developers.
Hosting.com takes a more minimalist approach. From the dashboard, I clicked Manage next to the VPS product. This brought me to the “Manage Your Product” page—a clean interface that had all the tools laid out clearly.
From the product page, I had immediate access to:
- Reboot, Shutdown, or Power On/Off
- Login Console (direct browser-based access, useful for troubleshooting)
- Attach Recovery ISO
- Reinstall OS
Everything was arranged into tabs like Overview, Billing, and Settings. I also found a secure vault called Product Secrets, where I could store root passwords, SSH keys, and other sensitive info—encrypted with AES-256. That’s rare for unmanaged VPS panels at this price point.
Hosting.com gives you just what you need to manage your server, without unnecessary fluff. But ScalaHosting’s SPanel offers more granularity and server-level tools in one place.
6. Privacy and Security Comparison: Which Platform is More Secure?
ScalaHosting Provides Stronger Overall Security with Real-Time AI-Powered Protection.
ScalaHosting Privacy and Security
When I tested ScalaHosting, the security features really stood out, especially for a platform that comes with built-in tools rather than requiring third-party plugins or upgrades.
At the center of it all is SShield, their AI-powered security system that actively monitors your websites and server 24/7. The moment you activate your server, SShield goes to work with real-time monitoring, scanning for suspicious activity, and blocking threats before they become serious.
According to ScalaHosting, it successfully blocks 99.998% of all malware and attack attempts, and based on my experience, I never ran into any warnings or issues during my test period.
The malware scanning is automatic, and if anything suspicious is detected, you receive immediate alerts with full details, down to the file affected and recommended actions.
Daily backups are automatically handled using SBackup, and I could easily restore older versions of my site within minutes—something Hosting.com didn’t include by default.
On top of that, SSL certificates were activated automatically through Let’s Encrypt the moment my domain pointed to the server. I didn’t have to configure anything.
For advanced protection, ScalaHosting includes Cloudflare integration, giving you both a CDN and DDoS protection. There’s also ModSecurity, which functions as a WAF to block common attacks like SQL injections and XSS.
Lastly, while they don’t brand it as a “Secure Access Manager,” ScalaHosting offers tools like SSH access, two-factor authentication, and user permissions management, which give you full control over who accesses your server and what they can do. In short, I found the security setup to be complete, proactive, and beginner-friendly.
Hosting.com Privacy and Security
Hosting.com also does a good job covering the basics, but it doesn’t go quite as deep in terms of hands-on security features, especially when you compare it side-by-side with ScalaHosting.
To begin with, Hosting.com includes a free SSL certificate, and like Scala, they integrate with Cloudflare for DDoS protection, DNS management, and a basic CDN layer. Cloudflare helps screen traffic between your visitors and the server, offering basic protection against malicious activity.
Malware scans are included, but there’s no clear explanation about how frequent or detailed they are. From what I could tell, there isn’t a real-time AI system like SShield in place.
Hosting.com’s WordPress installs come with performance and security enhancements through their “TurboHub” plugin, and you do get access to features that improve security at the CMS level, like keeping plugins up to date or limiting brute-force attempts.
One major drawback I noticed was that there was no built-in secure access manager. For users who care about access control, that’s a significant gap.
7. Server Locations Comparison
ScalaHosting Offers More Flexibility with Multiple Infrastructure Options Across the Globe.
When I was testing these two providers, I wanted to see not just how many server locations they offer, but how flexible and scalable each platform is, especially if you’re targeting visitors from different regions.
ScalaHosting Server Locations and Infrastructure
I started by looking into ScalaHosting’s infrastructure. What stood out immediately is that ScalaHosting doesn’t just rely on one type of setup—they give you three powerful deployment options:
- ScalaHosting Native Infrastructure
- AWS Cloud Infrastructure
- DigitalOcean Integration
This means I could host my site in a Scala-owned facility, or spin up my server on Amazon Web Services (AWS) or DigitalOcean, depending on my needs.
That kind of flexibility is rare and incredibly useful. If you’re aiming for specific latency or compliance needs, Scala lets you pick the platform and region that best suits your audience.
From their documentation and support, I learned that ScalaHosting can deploy servers in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, with multiple data center choices across continents. Even though they don’t publicly list every location, you’re guided through the available regions during the signup process based on the infrastructure you choose.
What I appreciated most is the level of redundancy and security. Each facility is certified with top-tier compliance standards like ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, and PCI DSS, and they use biometric access controls and on-site personnel 24/7. That’s a serious step up from the typical shared server rack scenario.
Also, sustainability matters to me, and ScalaHosting is one of the few providers I’ve seen that actually talks about renewable energy and minimizing carbon footprint at the data center level.
Hosting.com Server Locations and Infrastructure
Next, I reviewed Hosting.com (formerly A2 Hosting). Hosting.com lists 8 data centers on their VPS product page:
- Dallas, US
- Toronto, CA
- Mexico City, MX
- London, UK
- Frankfurt, DE
- Sydney, AU
- Singapore, SG
- Mumbai, IN
These locations are spread out well enough for global targeting, and during checkout, I was able to pick the one I wanted. I went with Dallas for my initial setup, but I was also curious if it’s possible to switch locations later.
So I reached out to support to ask if I could move my server from Dallas to London, for example. The answer? Yes, but not directly. I’d have to spin up a new server in the new region and manually migrate my data.
And since I was testing an unmanaged VPS, the migration would have to be done manually. No one-click transfer or automated migration tool was offered for changing locations. That might be fine for developers, but it’s not beginner-friendly.
Hosting.com’s infrastructure seems reliable, and I didn’t face any performance issues, but it feels more traditional. You’re picking from a fixed list of data centers, and once you choose, you’re locked into that location unless you start over. There’s no integration with major cloud platforms like AWS or DigitalOcean.
ScalaHosting vs Hosting.com: The Bottom Line
ScalaHosting wins overall because it strikes the perfect balance between ease of use, advanced features, and performance. Its SPanel control panel, built-in AI-powered security (SShield), and faster page load times give it the edge. While Hosting.com offers budget-friendly plans and good live chat support, ScalaHosting simply delivers more value across the board.
| Category | Winner | Why |
| Pricing and Plans | Hosting.com | Lower introductory prices and wider variety of affordable options |
| Support | Hosting.com | Responsive and friendly live chat support with helpful technical answers |
| Hosting Features | ScalaHosting | SPanel, unlimited emails, daily backups, and better developer tools |
| Website Performance | ScalaHosting | Faster load times and zero blocking based on GTmetrix results |
| Ease of Use | ScalaHosting | More streamlined onboarding and flexible WordPress setup |
| Privacy and Security | ScalaHosting | Built-in SShield AI, daily backups, and better access control tools |
| Server Locations | ScalaHosting | Supports AWS, DigitalOcean, and native infra for broader global reach |
